ProofOnboarding cut to under an hour

HRIS implementation that holds.

We configure every module, migrate your data, wire the integrations, and stay after go-live. Live in ~45 days.

Platforms we implement
  • Rippling
  • HiBob
  • ADP
  • Workday
  • Dayforce
Walk the build — kickoff to live
Who this is for

Three versions of the same wall.

Companies call us at one of three moments. All three end the same way: the system nobody designed stops being survivable.

Past the spreadsheet stage

Headcount crossed the line where a shared drive and a spreadsheet stopped working. Onboarding is manual, records live in four places, and nobody owns the system.

Multi-state or multi-entity

Two states became six. A second FEIN arrived with an acquisition. Compliance, payroll, and reporting all got harder in the same quarter.

Leaders who need real numbers

The board asks for headcount, spend, and attrition. You can produce a number. You cannot fully vouch for where it came from.

Leaving a PEO?The exit runs on a deadline you did not set, and the calendar does not move. There is an order this has to happen in.
What you get

Five things, all of them documented.

Platform design & build

D-01

We configure every module against how the company actually works, and design permissions by role before anything is switched on. Documented as we go, for whoever inherits it.

Platform design & build: Payroll, Benefits, Time, PTO, Onboarding, Offboarding.

Stays behindBuild documentation

Integration architecture

D-02

Your HRIS becomes the system of record. Everything else reads from it. Every handoff mapped before it is built.

Integration architecture: Identity, Ticketing, Finance, ATS.

Stays behindThe integration map

Data migration

D-03

Employee records, history, balances, and documents move with a reconciliation you can check line by line. Payroll runs in parallel before cutover, so nobody’s first day is also the system’s first test.

Data migration: Employee records, History, Balances, Documents.

Stays behindThe reconciliation, line by line

Operating cadence

D-04

A calendar for the recurring work, with a named owner against each line. The cadence keeps a clean build clean six months after go-live.

Operating cadence: Payroll close, Benefits changes, Audits, Reporting.

Stays behindThe calendar, with owners

Enablement

D-05

Admins learn the system on your configuration, not a demo tenant. Managers get the short version. Written runbooks stay behind, including the AI ones.

Enablement: Admins, Managers, AI tools.

Stays behindWritten runbooks
AI-ready by default

Every build ships AI-ready. Not as an add-on — as architecture.

Your platform’s AI inherits your permission structure — it’s only as safe as those permissions were designed to be. We design them. Then we enable the AI features worth enabling and train your admins on the tools — prompts included.

Process

Assess, design, build, launch, operate.

The same five phases every time, with the same artifacts at the end of each. Live in ~45 days for most builds.

  1. Assess

    Week 1
    1 week

    Current systems, current data, and every process that breaks. We tell you what to fix first.

  2. Design

    Weeks 1–2
    2 weeks

    Module map, permission architecture by role, integration plan. Signed off before anyone configures anything.

  3. Build

    Weeks 2–5
    4 weeks

    Configuration, integrations, and migration with reconciliation. Payroll runs in parallel.

  4. Launch

    Week 6
    1 week

    Cutover, first live payroll, hypercare. Admins trained on your build, not a demo tenant.

  5. Operate

    Ongoing
    No end date

    The cadence starts: payroll close, benefits changes, reporting, and an escalation path with a name on it.

Bars are drawn to the week markers above; Operate has no end date, so it runs open. Phases overlap on purpose — build starts on the modules already signed off while design finishes the rest.
Proof

What the record shows.

Compliance went from my biggest worry to a non-issue.

Scaling across states, compliance was the thing I worried about most. People Street rebuilt our HRIS and gave us a custom dashboard that turned multi-state compliance into something I just don’t think about anymore. That’s the kind of infrastructure that lets you grow without looking over your shoulder.

Ian BrodieCEO, Levanta
People Street — project specificationPS-HRIS-01
Service
HRIS implementation
Scope
Fixed project
Timeline
~45 days
Fee
From $25k · 25+ people
Platforms
Rippling · HiBob
Ships
AI-ready

A fixed project, from $25k.

For teams of 25 and up — it scales with headcount from there. Smaller than 25? Reach out. See pricing

What it costs you todayYour HRIS invoice is the part you can see. Price the whole year — eleven questions, about two minutes, nothing stored.
Questions

The nine we get asked every time.

How much does an implementation cost?

A fixed project, from $25k for teams of 25 and up — the floor scales with your headcount from there. Entity count, the condition of your data, and the timeline decide where it lands. You get one number in writing before anything starts, and it does not move afterwards. Every number, shared in full on our first call. Smaller than 25? Reach out.

How long does it take?

Live in ~45 days from kickoff for most builds, and as fast as 2 weeks for single-entity builds with clean data. Multi-entity, multi-state, or a payroll history rebuild takes longer. You get the honest estimate on the first call, before you commit to anything.

What breaks when we migrate off Gusto or BambooHR?

Usually three things: historical payroll that never fully exports, benefits elections that have to be re-keyed against carrier files, and permissions recreated from memory instead of design. We reconcile the first, verify the second with your carriers, and design the third before anything goes live.

Rippling or HiBob — which one for us?

Rippling if you want HR, IT, and payroll in one system, or you are exiting a PEO. HiBob if the people team is the primary user and analytics, compensation, and culture matter more than device management. We implement both, and our fee is set by your headcount band — identical on either platform — so the recommendation is about fit, not a sale.

Why not just use the platform's own implementation team?

They configure their software, and that part they do fine. What they don't do is decide how your company works first — approval chains, which records are the record, the permission architecture the AI layer inherits — or stay after go-live to run what they set up. Their job ends at launch; ours starts before it and continues after. And our fee is set by your headcount band, identical on either platform, so nothing pushes us toward the defaults.

What does the integration work actually cover?

Your HRIS becomes the source of record and the rest of the stack reads from it. Rippling and HiBob are our primary platforms, and we regularly connect them to identity providers, ticketing, finance systems, and your ATS. We map every handoff first, build it, then document what talks to what.

What happens after go-live?

Hypercare through the first full payroll cycle, then a choice. Some clients take the documentation and run the system themselves. Most move onto a managed operating cadence with us: payroll close, benefits changes, reporting, and a ticket desk with response targets we publish.

What if our system is a mess but we cannot switch platforms?

Then we fix what you have. A rescue starts with an audit of permissions, data, and the integrations nobody documented. Sometimes the answer is a rebuild inside the same platform. Sometimes it is smaller than you feared. We tell you which before you spend anything.

Why does AI make implementation quality matter more?

Because the AI answers from whatever it can see. A permission structure that was defaulted rather than designed used to produce a reporting annoyance. It now produces a manager who can ask a chatbot for salaries. Clean data and designed permissions stopped being hygiene and became the control.

Start here

20 minutes. No deck. No pitch.

You talk. We map what you’re running and where to start. The fixed quote follows the call, in writing.